MiFID II Update: Trading Obligation to Commence ‘Early’ in 2018
(Last updated: )
Introduction
On 28 September 2017, the European Securities and Markets Authority (“ESMA”) submitted its final report containing draft Regulatory Technical Standards (“RTS”) on the trading obligation for derivatives under MiFIR with respect to interest rate swaps (“IRS”) and credit default swaps (“CDS”) to the European Commission (“EC”). The EC has three months to decide whether or not to endorse the RTS.
Background
Article 28 of MiFIR introduces a trading obligation for certain classes of derivatives. Derivatives that are subject to the trading obligation may only be traded on a regulated market, multilateral trading facility, organised trading facility or an ‘equivalent’ third country trading venue. In order for the trading obligation to take effect certain conditions must be satisfied[1]:
- The relevant class of derivatives must be subject to the clearing obligation under EMIR; and
- The relevant class of derivatives (or a subset thereof) must be admitted to trading or traded on at least one trading venue (the “trading venue test”); and
- There must be sufficient third-party buying and selling interest in the class of derivatives (or subset thereof) so that the class can be considered “sufficiently liquid” (the “liquidity test”).
Whilst ESMA describes the liquidity test as involving a “holistic approach”, MiFIR also specifies criteria to be considered in determining whether the liquidity test has been satisfied[2], being:
- The average frequency and size of trades over a range of market conditions, having regard to the nature and lifecycle of products within the class of derivatives;
- The number and type of active market participants including the ratio of market participants to products/contracts traded in a given product market; and
- The average size of the spreads.
What’s included?
The Annex to this article details the classes of derivatives which ESMA proposes should be subject to the trading obligation.
What about Large Orders?
ESMA is required[3] to determine whether a class of derivatives is sufficiently liquid only in transactions below a certain size. However, it has proposed that large trades should NOT be exempt from the trading obligation. In concluding that “MiFIR already provides for a sufficient degree of flexibility to execute large trades”, ESMA points to:
- the different execution venues permitted under the trading obligation;
- the various trading models those execution venues can utilise and the ability of trading venues to apply for pre-trade waivers[4] to prevent information leakage; and
- the fact that MiFIR also provides market participants with post trade deferrals[5] that gives an “appropriate level of protection for large orders on the post-trade side”.
What about Package Transactions?
ESMA considers that its mandate for developing draft RTS specifying the trading obligation does not empower it to provide for a “tailored regime” with respect to package transactions. Instead it will provide further guidance within its MiFID II Q&As.
When does this all come into force?
ESMA considers that no significant delay of the phase-in of the trading obligation “appears warranted” with respect to category 1 and 2 counterparties. However, it “would not be opposed” to a short delay at the start of 2018 which should not exceed three months. Implementation dates for each class of OTC derivative are as detailed below:
OTC Derivatives Class |
Category of Counterparty |
|||
Category 1 | Category 2 | Category 3 | Category 4 | |
IRD (EUR, GBP, USD) | Date of application of the RTS on the trading obligation[6] | Date of application of the RTS on the trading obligation | 21 June 2019 | 21 December 2018 |
Credit Derivatives | Date of application of the RTS on the trading obligation | Date of application of the RTS on the trading obligation | 21 June 2019 | 9 May 2019 |
Annex
Classes of derivatives subject to the trading obligation
Table 1
Fixed-to-float interest rate swaps denominated in EUR
Fixed-to-Float single currency interest rate swaps – EUR EURIBOR 3 and 6M |
||
Settlement currency | EUR | EUR |
Trade start type | Spot (T+2) | Spot (T+2) |
Optionality | No | No |
Tenor[7] | 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,12,15,20,30Y | 2,3,4,5,6,7,10,15,20,30Y |
Notional type | Constant Notional | Constant Notional |
Fixed Leg |
||
Payment frequency | Annual or semi-annual | Annual or semi-annual |
Day count convention | 30/360 or Actual/360 | 30/360 or Actual/360 |
Floating Leg |
||
Reference Index | EURIBOR 6M | EURIBOR 3M |
Reset frequency | Semi-annual or quarterly | Quarterly |
Day count convention | Actual/360 | Actual/360 |
Table 2
Fixed-to-float interest rate swaps denominated in USD
Fixed-to-Float single currency interest rate swaps – USD LIBOR 3M |
||
Settlement currency | USD | USD |
Trade start type | Spot (T+2) | IMM[8] (next two IMM dates)[9] |
Optionality | No | No |
Tenor | 2,3,4,5,6,7,10,12,15,20,30Y | 2,3,4,5,6,7,10,12,15,20,30Y |
Notional type | Constant Notional | Constant Notional |
Fixed Leg |
||
Payment frequency | Annual or semi-annual | Annual or semi-annual |
Day count convention | 30/360 or Actual/360 | 30/360 or Actual/360 |
Floating Leg |
||
Reference Index | USD LIBOR 3M | USD LIBOR 3M |
Reset frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
Day count convention | Actual/360 | Actual/360 |
Fixed-to-Float single currency interest rate swaps – USD LIBOR 6M |
||
Settlement currency | USD | USD |
Trade start type | Spot (T+2) | IMM (next two IMM dates) |
Optionality | No | No |
Tenor | 2,3,4,5,6,7,10,12,15,20,30Y | 2,3,4,5,6,7,10,12,15,20,30Y |
Notional type | Constant Notional | Constant Notional |
Fixed Leg |
||
Payment frequency | Annual or semi-annual | Annual or semi-annual |
Day count convention | 30/360 or Actual/360 | 30/360 or Actual/360 |
Floating Leg |
||
Reference Index | USD LIBOR 6M | USD LIBOR 6M |
Reset frequency | Quarterly or semi-annual | Quarterly or semi-annual |
Day count convention | Actual/360 | Actual/360 |
Table 3
Fixed-to-float interest rate swaps denominated in GBP
Fixed-to-Float single currency interest rate swaps – GBP LIBOR 3 and 6M |
||
Settlement currency | GBP | GBP |
Trade start type | Spot (T+0) | Spot (T+0) |
Optionality | No | No |
Tenor | 2,3,4,5,6,7,10,15,20,30Y | 2,3,4,5,6,7,10,15,20,30Y |
Notional type | Constant Notional | Constant Notional |
Fixed Leg |
||
Payment frequency | Quarterly or semi-annual | Quarterly or semi-annual |
Day count convention | Actual/365F | Actual/365F |
Floating Leg |
||
Reference Index | GBP LIBOR 6M | GBP LIBOR 3M |
Reset frequency | Semi-annual or quarterly | Quarterly |
Day count convention | Actual/365F | Actual/365F |
Table 4
Index CDS
Type | Sub-type | Geographical Zone | Reference Index | Settlement Currency | Series | Tenor |
Index CDS | Untranched Index | Europe | iTraxx Europe Main | EUR | On-the-run series
First off-the-run series |
5y |
Index CDS | Untranched Index | Europe | iTraxx Europe Crossover | EUR | On-the-run series
First off-the-run series |
5y |
[1] See MiFIR, Articles 32(1) and 32(2)
[2] See MiFIR, Article 32(3)
[3] See MiFIR, Article 32(3)
[4] See MiFIR, Articles 9(1)(a) and 9(1)(b)
[5] See MiFIR, Article 11
[6] The day following publication of the RTS in the Official Journal of the EU
[7] A transaction will be deemed to have a tenor of a certain year where the period between the effective date and the termination date equals that year +/- five days
[8] “IMM” stands for “International Money Market”. “IMM Dates” are the third Wednesday of March, June, September and December
[9] This is referred to as “IMM +1” (i.e. the next “IMM Date”) and “IMM +2” (i.e. the second closest “IMM Date”)
Contact Us