Scripts

38. Process Agent

If you’ve ever worked on an ISDA Master Agreement, you’ve likely looked into who to put as process agent or whether to leave the field as “Not Applicable”. But what exactly is it and when do you need one?

In cross-border derivatives deals, parties often agree that legal disputes will be resolved in a specific jurisdiction, say, the courts of England and Wales. But what if one party isn’t based in that jurisdiction? That’s where a process agent comes in. A process agent is a local representative, usually an affiliate or a service company, appointed to accept service of legal process on behalf of a foreign party.

A process agent:

• Ensures valid service of process;
• Avoids delays in litigation;
• Avoids the costs that may be associated with serving process outside of the jurisdiction;
• May be required under Section 13(b) of the ISDA.

Without a valid process agent, you could face serious enforcement issues if you needed to commence legal proceedings against an overseas counterparty.

Here is a little bit of extra information for you. If you are considering signing up to the Notices Hub or you already have signed up, you might have considered if doing so alleviates the need for a Process Agent. The answer is no! A process agent is required to be appointed in the relevant jurisdiction so that litigation papers can be served on them. The Notices Hub is not in any particular jurisdiction and cannot accept service on anyone’s behalf. What could be available on the platform very soon though is the ability to update the process agent’s details so that if they move address or you change your process agent, you only have to update this once on the Notices Hub rather than having to write to each counterparty. That way, the Notices Hub would become the golden source for process agent address details. It’s a neat solution, isn’t it.

42. Specified Indebtedness

Let’s talk about a deceptively simple term in the ISDA – Specified Indebtedness. It’s probably one of the most negotiated definitions in the ISDA Master Agreement.

Specified Indebtedness defines what kind of debt can trigger a cross-default under the ISDA. It does not cover all obligations, just those explicitly listed in the Schedule.

Typically, it includes things like borrowed money, bonds, and guarantees. But it can exclude trade debt, leases, or derivatives themselves, depending on how parties negotiate it.

Suppose your counterparty defaults on a $50 million lease obligation. If leases are included in Specified Indebtedness and the threshold is $10 million, that default could trigger an Event of Default under your ISDA, even if your trade is performing perfectly.

---

This definition is strategic. A broad scope gives you early exit rights. A narrow one protects your counterparty from technical defaults. It’s a door that swings both ways in that the definition usually applies to both parties. So, when you’re drafting or reviewing an ISDA Schedule, don’t just accept the standard language, consider its risks and leverage opportunities.

Top of Form

43. Threshold

One term that often sparks nuanced discussion when negotiating a CSA is the Threshold.

Simply put, the Threshold is the credit exposure buffer a party is willing to tolerate before demanding collateral from its counterparty.

For relationships that need to comply with uncleared margin rules, the CSA Threshold must be set at zero under applicable regulation. However, for out-of-scope relationships the Threshold is a key risk management tool: too high, and you’re taking on excessive credit risk; too low, and operational burdens increase with frequent collateral calls.

Consider these contrasting positions:

A bank’s preference is for a lower Threshold. Why? Because banks prioritise credit protection. A lower threshold means collateral is posted sooner, limiting the bank’s exposure if a counterparty defaults.

Counterparties, by contrast, typically prefer higher Thresholds. Their goal is capital efficiency, less frequent, or no collateral calls mean they can deploy cash for trading or investing rather than tying it up. They are comfortable with taking on some counterparty credit risk in exchange for liquidity and flexibility.

For legal professionals, the Threshold isn’t just a number—it’s a reflection of negotiation, credit assessment, and regulatory strategy. It can affect:

• Counterparty risk allocation
• Collateral efficiency
• Negotiation leverage in documentation

Understanding its implications is crucial for drafting, reviewing, and advising on ISDA agreements. After all, in derivatives, small numbers can carry big consequences.

How does your firm approach setting the Threshold in practice? Let us know in the comments below.

44. Termination Currency

As the end of the year is approaching let’s turn our focus to what happens during the close-out of a transaction and what the role of the Termination Currency.

On the surface, it’s just the currency in which the Early Termination Amount is calculated and paid. But the choice is crucial.

Suppose your trades are in USD and EUR, but the Termination Currency is set as GBP. When you close out, everything must be converted into GBP, potentially at a time of market stress, that conversion alone can swing the final number.

Now, here’s the nuance lawyers should watch: the role of Termination Currency differs in collateral mechanics.

• Under Variation Margin (VM), the choice of Termination Currency does not typically result in the application of an FX haircut to any collateral posted under the VM CSA.
• Under Initial Margin (IM), collateral that is denominated in a currency other than the Termination Currency will be subject to an additional 8% FX haircut. This is on the basis that IM is held to protect a party against losses that arise during the close-out process following a counterparty’s default. Any currency mismatch between the currency of the close-out claim and the currency of the collateral, which may need to be liquidated to satisfy the close-out claim, creates FX risk which needs to be mitigated.

Termination Currency isn’t just a line in the Schedule, it can make or break the economics at close-out. Get it right, and you preserve the full value of your collateral, minimize FX risk, and ensure your close-out reflects the protection you negotiated.

45. Termination

Good morning ISDA Wednesday fans…For our last term, I thought it’s fitting to talk about what really happens when a Transaction under the ISDA is terminated.

Termination doesn’t just mean ending a transaction. It sets off a whole process under the Master Agreement, one that we often need to navigate carefully.

When a Termination Event or Event of Default occurs, the non-defaulting party may designate an Early Termination Date. That’s the point where all Affected Transactions are closed out. The ISDA then requires you to calculate a single net termination amount, using the methodology set out in the ISDA: Market Quotation or Loss, under a 1992 ISDA; or Close-out Amount, under a 2002 ISDA. I hope you remember those from the previous videos.

Here’s where it gets strategic. The chosen calculation method can create very different outcomes, especially in volatile markets. For lawyers, the key is understanding the leverage each party has in that calculation, and how negotiated elections in the Schedule, such as

the choice of Affected Party to a termination event,

governing law,

set-off rights,

or even the definition of unpaid amounts,

shape the final number when the transactions are terminated.

So when you hear someone referring to Termination or a Terminated Transaction think less about the deal ending and more about the legal machinery that decides who owes what. That’s where your drafting, and your negotiating, really matter.

Can you see how it is all coming together in the end? Well, that was all from me for this year. Thank you for being part of our ISDA Wednesdays! We hope you found them useful! And of course, if you need help negotiating your ISDAs, you know where to find me.